Thinking should not be bound to get rid of the frame of photography

What attitude do you use to evaluate photos, you will get what kind of photos. Take some of your favorite photos, grown up in a happy confident environment it is a very good thing. Thinking should not be bound to break photography theory frame. It is why we must first clear pictures.

1, In order to record. Just for a record any rules can be removed, fun, not sold photos is not afraid

2, In order to pictures look good.

In fact, the so-called rules in corresponding to different situations have different standards. And everyone will have a doubt, these so-called principles who decided?

First, the picture is color, level, there is space. The so-called head shots, is actually avoiding color control, level, space control well when people view, changed in person head gives birth to some strange object. That is to say, as long as from the color, level, on the space of distinguishes between the subject and the background is simple to break the law. In simple terms, large aperture processing. And the absence of large aperture, color, black and white, levels of processing. Anyway, must have the solution, and often a lot of people think so burst not good-looking, not comfortable, there is a reason in said method the composition characters put wrong cases, we may consider the equipment itself more whether can better solve the problem of the composition is bad? Perhaps the aperture, the distance space can be solved. Speak the truth, no matter how thrust, good-looking.

Second, Dixie composition

That I was on the platform before the said issues, it's a cliche, but in many cases, the diagonal composition is not thought of as bad. Actually has been using on your own, why do you say inclined composition is not good, meaning is actually afraid of in control of the picture out of balance, causing instability of visual effect, and we are from the visual Angle to think about it, the effect is not necessarily wrong, in a picture of a tilt of the directivity is very strong, tired of watching for something, in a kind of new method is better technique of expression, and in some cases is not inclined to suck things we need more inclined composition.

While we refused to tilt the composition will lose more possibilities, each picture can have unique ways to show, if always abide by the rules, and we will be a lot less. Many cartoon images are Dixie, we will feel very normal is very good-looking, because in line with the aesthetic. That is to say as long as look do not lose the balance, Dixie shooting is not a problem.

Third, the scenery and people's proportion imbalance highlight a character

First of all, we most of the time will be taken in an unexpected environment, sometimes really good environment. Dropping the outstanding landscape also is not. People view always makes better artistic conception. Even if the face is really too small can't see at all. Again, looking for don't care so much! You see studios to overseas that shoot taps one scene or the scene together? Of course is combined with the scene. Not go that far shooting portraits screen characters accounted for more than 50% that's doing, false ~ background depth

Fourth, picture mixed and disorderly

Image clutter violates don't know who said that art photography is subtraction. Certainly can't say subtraction art is bad, because from the subtraction of art to look can be very easy to highlight the main body, but does not represent addition art unable to highlight the main body.

Thinking should not be bound to break photography theory frame

Picture even if again disorderly or clear or there is no problem as long as the subject, to see the picture again disorderly also not disorderly, transformers movie set also mess, have to see, but still can see the machinery and the battle area, disorderly and not disorderly refers to the control of the picture, if but how much you have things to judge from the picture is not absolutely wrong. Do not represent something more, the hair also mixed and disorderly, messy hair and a whole again, distinguish between what all don't disorderly.

Fifth, the characters in the middle of the picture

Remember when I was learning to paint, the teacher in order to let students practice the composition, the 4:3 paper cut into 1-1 square, on the square to the composition, you can have a try in the square composition, good fun. In the way of the central composition problem, vision in the center is wrong? Perpendicular to the visual effect is wrong? The impact of the picture is wrong? Design with pure art is separated? Who is a kind of art, there is no limit, limit, just waiting to be age mother abandoned.

Sixth, Angle is wrong, whether too high or too low

Directly say, it is not high and low, high can look up, it is too high, it is a question of body is put, or immediate reaction when shooting plan out will find that in fact as long as a change of attitude or action can solve the problem directly. Doesn't mean you can't too high or too low, many times we have the special action and scenario, as cooperation, action and reservation they can be solved quickly.

If not, it is a model for the scene not to force him not to force, so just don't shoot, don't give force to take his re-building. Ruled out any difficulty, the discretion of the Angle is a challenge rather than not allowed.

Seventh, shear

Disorderly cut, cut knee, shear elbow, shears barefoot. Shear and how? How many photos can be commercial purpose, even commercial purposes cannot be cut? Of cause, you can figure out how much advertising is disorganized shear, everything for the result. It is totally different situation processing, not a great shot. View completely and must become more photos character's limbs should be cut in an appropriate place. Shear is no problem, just have to look the matter, we can't put the thing to deceive people, some things must be cut, in some cases can leave is of course a little more. If even without shear, so whether to complete her to clap, obvious not.